Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies
January 2013 , 52 Pages
- Council Special Report
- Concise policy briefs that provide timely responses to developing crises or contributions to current policy dilemmas.
Overview
Over the last ten years, drones have become a critical tool in the war against terrorist and militant organizations worldwide. Their advantages over other weapons and intelligence systems are well known. They can silently observe an individual, group, or location for hours on end, but take immediate action should a strike opportunity become available--all without putting a pilot at risk. This combination of capabilities is unique and has allowed the United States to decimate the leadership of al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and disrupt the activities of many other militant groups.
Yet, as Micah Zenko writes in this Council Special Report from the Center for Preventive Action (CPA), drones are not without their drawbacks, especially with regard to targeted killings. Like any tool, drones are only as useful as the information guiding them, and for this they are heavily reliant on local military and intelligence cooperation. More important, significant questions exist about who constitutes a legitimate target and under what circumstances it is acceptable to strike. There is also the question of net utility: To what extent are the specific benefits derived from drone strikes offset by the reality that the strikes often alienate the local government and population? And there is the reality that drones are proliferating but, as is often the case with new technologies, the international legal and regulatory framework is lagging behind.
More on:
Zenko puts forward a substantive agenda. He argues that the United States should end so-called signature strikes, which target unidentified militants based on their behavior patterns and personal networks, and limit targeted killings to a limited number of specific terrorists with transnational ambitions. He also calls Congress to improve its oversight of drone strikes and to continue restrictions on armed drone sales. Finally, he recommends that the United States work internationally to establish rules and norms governing the use of drones.
Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies raises an important and underexamined set of issues. It analyzes the potentially serious consequences, both at home and abroad, of a lightly overseen drone program and makes recommendations for improving its governance. The result is a provocative report that is well worth reading and contemplating.
Professors: To request an exam copy, contact [email protected]. Please include your university and course name.
Bookstores: To order bulk copies, please contact Ingram. Visit https://ipage.ingrambook.com, call 800.234.6737, or email [email protected]. ISBN: 978-0-87609-544-7
More on:
In the News
Drone Strikes and Congressional PowerCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Legal, Ethical, And Political Issues In Use Of Drones – AnalysisCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
America is Setting a Dangerous Precedent for the Drone AgeCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
U.S. Drone Strikes Ineffective Solution To Combat Militants In Pakistan's Tribal Areas, Report SaysCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Pentagon Calls Civilian Casualties "Bug Splat"Council on Foreign Relations Press
Drone Strikes and Diplomacy, from Yemen to PakistanCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Armed Drones Could Target President: Former U.S. Intelligence ChiefCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Debate Aside, Number of Drone Strikes Drops SharplyCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Former Obama Official Defends Drone Program, Calls For More TransparencyCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Discussion about President Obama's speechCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Obama Overseas: Speak Loudly And Carry A Smaller StickCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Add Morality to List of Drone VictimsCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
New U.S. Counterterrorism Guidelines Face QuestionsCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Zenko: 'Unbelievable' that U.S. killed only one civilian in drone strikesCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Ten Questions for Chuck HagelCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Drone Strikes Reveal Uncomfortable Truth: U.S. Is Often Unsure About Who Will DieCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Targeted Killings: Obama's Endless WarCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
U.S. Drone Strategy Draws Home-grown Criticism Over Lack of TransparencyCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Brennan Faces Drone Attack from SenatorsCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Brennan's Confirmation and Where CIA Drones Go From HereCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
If You Thought Obama's Drone Godfather Was Powerful, Wait 'Til He's at the CIACouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Drone Strikes Under ScrutinyCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Micah Zenko's CFR Report on Drones PolicyCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Senators, John Brennan Brace for National Security Showdown in CIA HearingCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
U.S. Drone Strikes Increase With Start Of New YearCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Open-source Data Contradicts Feinstein on 'Single-Digit' Civilian Drone DeathsCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
Reforming U.S. Policies on Drone StrikesCouncil on Foreign Relations Press
On Drones, Obama is BushCouncil on Foreign Relations Press